A rubric-plus-question-answering LLM framework for literary translation evaluation beats traditional MT metrics but still trails human agreement, especially on Korean honorifics.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A 2-step Framework for Automated Literary Translation Evaluation: Its Promises and Pitfalls
A rubric-plus-question-answering LLM framework for literary translation evaluation beats traditional MT metrics but still trails human agreement, especially on Korean honorifics.