A 5,352-pair benchmark shows thinking LLMs outperform non-thinking ones as code judges, but position bias and formatting sensitivity remain strong.
Automated unit test improvement using large language models at meta
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
CodeJudgeBench: Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Coding Tasks
A 5,352-pair benchmark shows thinking LLMs outperform non-thinking ones as code judges, but position bias and formatting sensitivity remain strong.