The paper claims a posterior-sampling algorithm achieves the optimal error exponent for fixed-budget linear best feasible arm identification, but the proof has scaling and direction errors.
Pareto Set Identification With Posterior Sampling
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The problem of identifying the best answer among a collection of items having real-valued distribution is well-understood. Despite its practical relevance for many applications, fewer works have studied its extension when multiple and potentially conflicting metrics are available to assess an item's quality. Pareto set identification (PSI) aims to identify the set of answers whose means are not uniformly worse than another. This paper studies PSI in the transductive linear setting with potentially correlated objectives. Building on posterior sampling in both the stopping and the sampling rules, we propose the PSIPS algorithm that deals simultaneously with structure and correlation without paying the computational cost of existing oracle-based algorithms. Both from a frequentist and Bayesian perspective, PSIPS is asymptotically optimal. We demonstrate its good empirical performance in real-world and synthetic instances.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Asymptotically Optimal Linear Best Feasible Arm Identification with Fixed Budget
The paper claims a posterior-sampling algorithm achieves the optimal error exponent for fixed-budget linear best feasible arm identification, but the proof has scaling and direction errors.