Pith. sign in

A Plug-and-Play Method for Controlled Text Generation

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Large pre-trained language models have repeatedly shown their ability to produce fluent text. Yet even when starting from a prompt, generation can continue in many plausible directions. Current decoding methods with the goal of controlling generation, e.g., to ensure specific words are included, either require additional models or fine-tuning, or work poorly when the task at hand is semantically unconstrained, e.g., story generation. In this work, we present a plug-and-play decoding method for controlled language generation that is so simple and intuitive, it can be described in a single sentence: given a topic or keyword, we add a shift to the probability distribution over our vocabulary towards semantically similar words. We show how annealing this distribution can be used to impose hard constraints on language generation, something no other plug-and-play method is currently able to do with SOTA language generators. Despite the simplicity of this approach, we see it works incredibly well in practice: decoding from GPT-2 leads to diverse and fluent sentences while guaranteeing the appearance of given guide words. We perform two user studies, revealing that (1) our method outperforms competing methods in human evaluations; and (2) forcing the guide words to appear in the generated text has no impact on the fluency of the generated text.

fields

cs.CV 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

FLIP Reasoning Challenge

cs.CV · 2025-04-16 · conditional · novelty 6.0

The FLIP benchmark of 11,674 blockchain image-story puzzles shows best open and closed AI models reach 75.5% and 77.9% accuracy, below the 95.3% human consensus baseline.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • FLIP Reasoning Challenge cs.CV · 2025-04-16 · conditional · none · ref 35 · internal anchor

    The FLIP benchmark of 11,674 blockchain image-story puzzles shows best open and closed AI models reach 75.5% and 77.9% accuracy, below the 95.3% human consensus baseline.