TEDI learns truthful, revenue-maximizing mechanisms by representing prices as continuous partially convex functions and training them with a covariance gradient trick and Langevin sampling, without discretizing outcomes.
Auction learning as a two-player game
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Designing an incentive compatible auction that maximizes expected revenue is a central problem in Auction Design. While theoretical approaches to the problem have hit some limits, a recent research direction initiated by Duetting et al. (2019) consists in building neural network architectures to find optimal auctions. We propose two conceptual deviations from their approach which result in enhanced performance. First, we use recent results in theoretical auction design (Rubinstein and Weinberg, 2018) to introduce a time-independent Lagrangian. This not only circumvents the need for an expensive hyper-parameter search (as in prior work), but also provides a principled metric to compare the performance of two auctions (absent from prior work). Second, the optimization procedure in previous work uses an inner maximization loop to compute optimal misreports. We amortize this process through the introduction of an additional neural network. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by learning competitive or strictly improved auctions compared to prior work. Both results together further imply a novel formulation of Auction Design as a two-player game with stationary utility functions.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.GT 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Learning Truthful Mechanisms without Discretization
TEDI learns truthful, revenue-maximizing mechanisms by representing prices as continuous partially convex functions and training them with a covariance gradient trick and Langevin sampling, without discretizing outcomes.