For conservative horseshoes and for the classical Lagrange spectrum, the equality HD(k^{-1}(t)) = HD(k^{-1}(-∞,t]) holds precisely for t in a strictly increasing 'J' set, up to a countable exceptional set.
Hausdorff dimension of Gauss--Cantor sets and two applications to classical Lagrange and Markov spectra
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This paper is dedicated to the study of two famous subsets of the real line, namely Lagrange spectrum $L$ and Markov spectrum $M$. Our first result, Theorem 2.1, provides a rigorous estimate on the smallest value $t_1$ such that the portion of the Markov spectrum $(-\infty,t_1)\cap M$ has Hausdorff dimension $1$. Our second result, Theorem 3.1, gives a new upper bound on the Hausdorff dimension of the set difference $M\setminus L$. Our method combines new facts about the structure of the classical spectra together with finer estimates on the Hausdorff dimension of Gauss--Cantor sets of continued fraction expansions whose entries satisfy appropriate restrictions.
fields
math.DS 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Concentration of dimension in the Lagrange spectrum
For conservative horseshoes and for the classical Lagrange spectrum, the equality HD(k^{-1}(t)) = HD(k^{-1}(-∞,t]) holds precisely for t in a strictly increasing 'J' set, up to a countable exceptional set.