Semantic constituency graphs outperform syntactic constituency and dependency structures from seven formalisms when added to a Transformer for language modeling.
Do Neural Language Models Show Preferences for Syntactic Formalisms?
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Linguistic Frameworks Go Toe-to-Toe at Neuro-Symbolic Language Modeling
Semantic constituency graphs outperform syntactic constituency and dependency structures from seven formalisms when added to a Transformer for language modeling.
- To MRL or not to MRL: Text Embeddings are Robust to Truncation Without Matryoshka Learning, Except In Heavy Truncation Scenarios