Pith. sign in

Learning to Reason Over Time: Timeline Self-Reflection for Improved Temporal Reasoning in Language Models

1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 1 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
1 external citations · Pith
abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for generating coherent text, understanding context, and performing reasoning tasks. However, they struggle with temporal reasoning, which requires processing time-related information such as event sequencing, durations, and inter-temporal relationships. These capabilities are critical for applications including question answering, scheduling, and historical analysis. In this paper, we introduce TISER, a novel framework that enhances the temporal reasoning abilities of LLMs through a multi-stage process that combines timeline construction with iterative self-reflection. Our approach leverages test-time scaling to extend the length of reasoning traces, enabling models to capture complex temporal dependencies more effectively. This strategy not only boosts reasoning accuracy but also improves the traceability of the inference process. Experimental results demonstrate state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmarks, including out-of-distribution test sets, and reveal that TISER enables smaller open-source models to surpass larger closed-weight models on challenging temporal reasoning tasks.

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Strategic Reflectivism In Intelligent Systems

cs.AI · 2025-05-29 · conditional · novelty 4.0

Strategic Reflectivism holds that intelligent systems should allocate reflective reasoning tactically, weighing its benefits against its costs.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Strategic Reflectivism In Intelligent Systems cs.AI · 2025-05-29 · conditional · none · ref 2025 · internal anchor

    Strategic Reflectivism holds that intelligent systems should allocate reflective reasoning tactically, weighing its benefits against its costs.