pith. sign in

LLMs and Speech: Integration vs. Combination

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

In this work, we study how to best utilize pre-trained LLMs for automatic speech recognition. Specifically, we compare the tight integration of an acoustic model (AM) with the LLM ("speech LLM") to the traditional way of combining AM and LLM via shallow fusion. For tight integration, we provide ablations on the effect of different label units, fine-tuning strategies, LLM sizes and pre-training data, attention interfaces, encoder downsampling, text prompts, and length normalization. Additionally, we investigate joint recognition with a CTC model to mitigate hallucinations of speech LLMs and present effective optimizations for this joint recognition. For shallow fusion, we investigate the effect of fine-tuning the LLM on the transcriptions using different label units, and we compare rescoring AM hypotheses to single-pass recognition with label-wise or delayed fusion of AM and LLM scores. We train on Librispeech and Loquacious and evaluate our models on the HuggingFace ASR leaderboard.

fields

eess.AS 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

LLMs and Speech: Integration vs. Combination

eess.AS · 2026-03-16 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

Tight integration of acoustic models with LLMs for ASR is ablated against shallow fusion across label units, fine-tuning strategies, LLM sizes, and joint CTC decoding to mitigate hallucinations.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • LLMs and Speech: Integration vs. Combination eess.AS · 2026-03-16 · unverdicted · none · ref 1 · internal anchor

    Tight integration of acoustic models with LLMs for ASR is ablated against shallow fusion across label units, fine-tuning strategies, LLM sizes, and joint CTC decoding to mitigate hallucinations.