A hierarchy of linear programs computes provable upper and lower bounds on measurement incompatibility and quantum steering, scaling polynomially with the number of measurements.
The geometry of the Einstein--Podolsky--Rosen correlations
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Correlations between distant particles are central to many puzzles and paradoxes of quantum mechanics and, at the same time, underpin various applications like quantum cryptography and metrology. Originally in 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) used these correlations to argue against the completeness of quantum mechanics. To formalise their argument, Schr\"odinger subsequently introduced the notion of quantum steering. Still, the question which quantum states can be used for the EPR argument and which not remained open. Here we show that quantum steering can be viewed as an inclusion problem in convex geometry. For the case of two spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ particles, this approach completely characterises the set of states leading to the EPR argument and consequently to a full description of the quantum correlations that can be used for steering. Our results find applications in various protocols in quantum information processing, and moreover they are linked to quantum mechanical phenomena such as uncertainty relations and the question which observables in quantum mechanics are jointly measurable.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
quant-ph 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Measurement incompatibility and quantum steering via linear programming
A hierarchy of linear programs computes provable upper and lower bounds on measurement incompatibility and quantum steering, scaling polynomially with the number of measurements.