Generative models privatize social relations by automating social capacities into synthetic forms owned by private companies.
Cold, Calculated, and Condescending
6 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
6
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 3
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 6roles
background 2representative citing papers
Counterfactual prompting effects on LLMs are often indistinguishable from those caused by meaning-preserving paraphrases, causing most previously reported demographic sensitivities to disappear under proper statistical comparison.
A methodological framework detects subtle group-associated linguistic biases in LLM outputs by generating controlled synthetic minimal pairs, abstracting n-grams, and ranking high-signal fragments with a PMI variant for expert review.
AI accuracy evaluation requires four normative choices on metrics, balancing, representative data, and thresholds that embed assumptions about risks and trade-offs, as analyzed through the EU AI Act.
A literature review concludes that pursuing consensus in data annotation creates biased AI by dismissing subjective disagreements and enforcing geographic hegemony, and proposes mapping diversity instead.
Literature on system prompts for AI shows fragmented and contradictory claims that complicate policy efforts to use them as reliable governance mechanisms.
citing papers explorer
-
Synthetic Sociality: How Generative Models Privatize the Social Fabric
Generative models privatize social relations by automating social capacities into synthetic forms owned by private companies.
-
The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotation
A literature review concludes that pursuing consensus in data annotation creates biased AI by dismissing subjective disagreements and enforcing geographic hegemony, and proposes mapping diversity instead.