Pith. sign in

Enhancing Multi-Agent Consensus through Third-Party LLM Integration: Analyzing Uncertainty and Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) still face challenges when dealing with complex reasoning tasks, often resulting in hallucinations, which limit the practical application of LLMs. To alleviate this issue, this paper proposes a new method that integrates different LLMs to expand the knowledge boundary, reduce dependence on a single model, and promote in-depth debate among agents. The main contributions include: 1) Introducing third-party LLMs to adjust the attention weights of agents through uncertainty estimation and confidence analysis, optimizing consensus formation in multi-agent systems; 2) Experiments on arithmetic datasets have validated the effectiveness of the method, surpassing traditional multi-agent baselines. This research provides a new perspective for large models to alleviate hallucination phenomena when dealing with complex tasks.

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

CortexDebate: Debating Sparsely and Equally for Multi-Agent Debate

cs.AI · 2025-07-05 · conditional · novelty 5.0

CortexDebate prunes the multi-agent debate graph every round using a McKinsey-style trust score per directed link, reporting accuracy gains over full-debate baselines on eight datasets with shorter per-agent contexts.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • CortexDebate: Debating Sparsely and Equally for Multi-Agent Debate cs.AI · 2025-07-05 · conditional · none · ref 10 · internal anchor

    CortexDebate prunes the multi-agent debate graph every round using a McKinsey-style trust score per directed link, reporting accuracy gains over full-debate baselines on eight datasets with shorter per-agent contexts.