A methodological framework detects subtle group-associated linguistic biases in LLM outputs by generating controlled synthetic minimal pairs, abstracting n-grams, and ranking high-signal fragments with a PMI variant for expert review.
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , year =
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Generative AI suitability in qualitative research depends primarily on the approach (small-q positivist/post-positivist or Big Q non-positivist) along with skills, ethics, and personal preferences.
citing papers explorer
-
Contrastive Analysis of Linguistic Representations in Large Language Model Outputs through Structured Synthetic Data Generation and Abstracted N-gram Associations
A methodological framework detects subtle group-associated linguistic biases in LLM outputs by generating controlled synthetic minimal pairs, abstracting n-grams, and ranking high-signal fragments with a PMI variant for expert review.
-
To Vibe Research or Not to Vibe Research? Generative AI in Qualitative Research
Generative AI suitability in qualitative research depends primarily on the approach (small-q positivist/post-positivist or Big Q non-positivist) along with skills, ethics, and personal preferences.