Existing visual attribution methods often fail to identify the visual evidence used by LVLMs in chest X-ray reasoning, while MedFocus using unbalanced optimal transport and targeted interventions substantially outperforms them across multiple models and settings.
A dataset of clinically generated visual questions and answers about radiology images.Scientific data, 5(1): 180251, 2018
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CV 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Rethinking Visual Attribution for Chest X-ray Reasoning in Large Vision Language Models
Existing visual attribution methods often fail to identify the visual evidence used by LVLMs in chest X-ray reasoning, while MedFocus using unbalanced optimal transport and targeted interventions substantially outperforms them across multiple models and settings.