NIRVANA supplies keystroke-level logs, complete ChatGPT dialogues, and copied content from 77 students to reconstruct AI-assisted essay writing and classify students into four behavioral profiles: Lead Authors, Collaborators, Drafters, and Vibe Writers.
Avey, Bruce J
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
method 1
citation-polarity summary
representative citing papers
People judge copying AI-generated content as less wrong than copying human work because AI lacks moral patiency and humans claim more ownership of AI outputs.
An online study of 70 students found that gender, race, and self-efficacy predict distinct ChatGPT query patterns during essay writing, with patterns linked to enjoyment and perceived ownership of the final essay.
citing papers explorer
-
NIRVANA: A Comprehensive Dataset for Reproducing How Students Use Generative AI for Essay Writing
NIRVANA supplies keystroke-level logs, complete ChatGPT dialogues, and copied content from 77 students to reconstruct AI-assisted essay writing and classify students into four behavioral profiles: Lead Authors, Collaborators, Drafters, and Vibe Writers.
-
Can AI be a moral victim? The role of moral patiency and ownership perceptions in ethical judgments of using AI-generated content
People judge copying AI-generated content as less wrong than copying human work because AI lacks moral patiency and humans claim more ownership of AI outputs.
-
An Empirical Study to Understand How Students Use ChatGPT for Writing Essays
An online study of 70 students found that gender, race, and self-efficacy predict distinct ChatGPT query patterns during essay writing, with patterns linked to enjoyment and perceived ownership of the final essay.