On six human-designed tests of reading charts and graphs, eight vision-language models scored below human participants and their error patterns fell far short of the human noise ceiling.
Enhancing Question Answering on Charts Through Effective Pre-training Tasks
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
To completely understand a document, the use of textual information is not enough. Understanding visual cues, such as layouts and charts, is also required. While the current state-of-the-art approaches for document understanding (both OCR-based and OCR-free) work well, a thorough analysis of their capabilities and limitations has not yet been performed. Therefore, in this work, we addresses the limitation of current VisualQA models when applied to charts and plots. To investigate shortcomings of the state-of-the-art models, we conduct a comprehensive behavioral analysis, using ChartQA as a case study. Our findings indicate that existing models particularly underperform in answering questions related to the chart's structural and visual context, as well as numerical information. To address these issues, we propose three simple pre-training tasks that enforce the existing model in terms of both structural-visual knowledge, as well as its understanding of numerical questions. We evaluate our pre-trained model (called MatCha-v2) on three chart datasets - both extractive and abstractive question datasets - and observe that it achieves an average improvement of 1.7% over the baseline model.
fields
cs.HC 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
CHART-6: Human-Centered Evaluation of Data Visualization Understanding in Vision-Language Models
On six human-designed tests of reading charts and graphs, eight vision-language models scored below human participants and their error patterns fell far short of the human noise ceiling.