A scoping review organizes decades of NLP evaluation debates into a taxonomy of recurring concerns and trade-offs with a structured checklist for better evaluation design.
InProceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 643–653, Melbourne, Australia
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Evaluation Revisited: A Taxonomy of Evaluation Concerns in Natural Language Processing
A scoping review organizes decades of NLP evaluation debates into a taxonomy of recurring concerns and trade-offs with a structured checklist for better evaluation design.