Systems analyses of a frontier-lab AI coding agent scenario using STECA, STPA, and FRAM reveal unverifiable governance loops, ineffective control delays, and gradual safeguard erosion, supporting the addition of systems-level methods to model-focused AI evaluations.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.15846 , year =
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.CY 4representative citing papers
A methodology to derive targeted Loss of Control mitigations by backchaining from AI errors on national security benchmarks to specific affordances and permissions.
Frontier AI safety policies have a structural coordination gap caused by diffuse benefits and concentrated costs, which can be addressed by adapting precommitment and shared response protocols from other high-risk domains.
citing papers explorer
-
Exploring Systems-Thinking Approaches to Loss of Control Risk
Systems analyses of a frontier-lab AI coding agent scenario using STECA, STPA, and FRAM reveal unverifiable governance loops, ineffective control delays, and gradual safeguard erosion, supporting the addition of systems-level methods to model-focused AI evaluations.
-
Backchaining Loss of Control Mitigations from Mission-Specific Benchmarks in National Security
A methodology to derive targeted Loss of Control mitigations by backchaining from AI errors on national security benchmarks to specific affordances and permissions.
-
The coordination gap in frontier AI safety policies
Frontier AI safety policies have a structural coordination gap caused by diffuse benefits and concentrated costs, which can be addressed by adapting precommitment and shared response protocols from other high-risk domains.
- Internal Deployment in the AI Act