A research plan proposes pairing neural networks with ILP systems so that AI predictions come with human-readable logical rules, with early tests in weather, law, and biology.
Causal Graph Justifications of Logic Programs
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In this work we propose a multi-valued extension of logic programs under the stable models semantics where each true atom in a model is associated with a set of justifications. These justifications are expressed in terms of causal graphs formed by rule labels and edges that represent their application ordering. For positive programs, we show that the causal justifications obtained for a given atom have a direct correspon- dence to (relevant) syntactic proofs of that atom using the program rules involved in the graphs. The most interesting contribution is that this causal information is obtained in a purely semantic way, by algebraic op- erations (product, sum and application) on a lattice of causal values whose ordering relation expresses when a justification is stronger than another. Finally, for programs with negation, we define the concept of causal stable model by introducing an analogous transformation to Gelfond and Lifschitz's program reduct. As a result, default negation behaves as "absence of proof" and no justification is derived from negative liter
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LO 1years
2025 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Bridging Logic Programming and Deep Learning for Explainability through ILASP
A research plan proposes pairing neural networks with ILP systems so that AI predictions come with human-readable logical rules, with early tests in weather, law, and biology.