Pith. sign in

Diquark and light four-quark states

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Four-quark states with different internal clusters are discussed within the constituent quark model. It is pointed out that the diquark concept is not meaningful in the construction of a tetraquark interpolating current in the QCD sum rule approach, and hence existing sum-rule studies of four-quark states are incomplete. An updated QCD sum-rule determination of the properties of diquark clusters is then used as input for the constituent quark model to obtain the masses of light $0^{++}$ tetraquark states ({\it i.e.\} a bound state of two diquark clusters). The results support the identification of $\sigma(600)$, $f_0(980)$ and $a_0(980)$ as the $0^{++}$ light tetraquark states, and seem to be inconsistent with the tetraquark state interpretation of the new BES observations of the near-threshold $p\bar p$ enhancements, X(1835) and X(1812), with the possible exception that X(1576) may be an "exotic" first orbital excitation of $f_0(980)$ or $a_0(980)$.

fields

hep-ph 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

$X(3872)$ and hidden charmed tetraquarks

hep-ph · 2025-06-30 · conditional · novelty 4.0

A diquark-antidiquark quark model with parameters fitted to X(3872) and Tcc predicts hidden-charm tetraquark masses and tentatively assigns XYZ states.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • $X(3872)$ and hidden charmed tetraquarks hep-ph · 2025-06-30 · conditional · none · ref 85 · internal anchor

    A diquark-antidiquark quark model with parameters fitted to X(3872) and Tcc predicts hidden-charm tetraquark masses and tentatively assigns XYZ states.