WebRetriever is a benchmark of 800 websites and 1,550 tasks with an automated evaluator (NavEval) achieving ~91–97% human agreement, showing current web agents succeed on only 11–37% of realistic tasks across three evaluation protocols.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05955 , year=
6 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
6
Pith papers citing it
abstract
Multimodal Large Language models (MLLMs) have shown promise in web-related tasks, but evaluating their performance in the web domain remains a challenge due to the lack of comprehensive benchmarks. Existing benchmarks are either designed for general multimodal tasks, failing to capture the unique characteristics of web pages, or focus on end-to-end web agent tasks, unable to measure fine-grained abilities such as OCR, understanding, and grounding. In this paper, we introduce \bench{}, a multimodal benchmark designed to assess the capabilities of MLLMs across a variety of web tasks. \bench{} consists of seven tasks, and comprises 1.5K human-curated instances from 139 real websites, covering 87 sub-domains. We evaluate 14 open-source MLLMs, Gemini Pro, Claude-3 series, and GPT-4V(ision) on \bench{}, revealing significant challenges and performance gaps. Further analysis highlights the limitations of current MLLMs, including inadequate grounding in text-rich environments and subpar performance with low-resolution image inputs. We believe \bench{} will serve as a valuable resource for the research community and contribute to the creation of more powerful and versatile MLLMs for web-related applications.
citation-role summary
background 2
method 1
citation-polarity summary
representative citing papers
A dual local/global selection of ~100 non-agentic instances predicts four agentic benchmarks with LOOCV MAE under 4%, Spearman above 0.80, and ~85% pairwise ranking accuracy at under 1% of full agent cost.
Introduces DocOS benchmark to test GUI agents on proactively locating, comprehending, and executing instructions from online documentation in interactive web settings.
Seed1.5-VL is a compact multimodal model that sets new records on dozens of vision-language benchmarks and outperforms prior systems on agent-style tasks.
A survey consolidating frameworks, data practices, large action models, benchmarks, applications, and research gaps in LLM-brained GUI agents.
This survey discusses key components and challenges for Personal LLM Agents and reviews solutions for their capability, efficiency, and security.
citing papers explorer
-
WebRetriever: A Large-Scale Comprehensive Benchmark for Efficient Web Agent Evaluation
WebRetriever is a benchmark of 800 websites and 1,550 tasks with an automated evaluator (NavEval) achieving ~91–97% human agreement, showing current web agents succeed on only 11–37% of realistic tasks across three evaluation protocols.
-
PACE: A Proxy for Agentic Capability Evaluation
A dual local/global selection of ~100 non-agentic instances predicts four agentic benchmarks with LOOCV MAE under 4%, Spearman above 0.80, and ~85% pairwise ranking accuracy at under 1% of full agent cost.
-
DocOS: Towards Proactive Document-Guided Actions in GUI Agents
Introduces DocOS benchmark to test GUI agents on proactively locating, comprehending, and executing instructions from online documentation in interactive web settings.
-
Seed1.5-VL Technical Report
Seed1.5-VL is a compact multimodal model that sets new records on dozens of vision-language benchmarks and outperforms prior systems on agent-style tasks.
-
Large Language Model-Brained GUI Agents: A Survey
A survey consolidating frameworks, data practices, large action models, benchmarks, applications, and research gaps in LLM-brained GUI agents.
-
Personal LLM Agents: Insights and Survey about the Capability, Efficiency and Security
This survey discusses key components and challenges for Personal LLM Agents and reviews solutions for their capability, efficiency, and security.