Pith. sign in

SIA: Self Improving AI with Harness & Weight Updates

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Humans are the bottleneck in building and improving AI. Both the models and the agents that wrap them are written, tuned, and corrected by people. The long-horizon goal of an AI that can figure out how to improve itself remains open. Two largely disjoint research lines attack this bottleneck. The harness-update school has a meta-agent rewrite the scaffold of a task-specific agent (its tools, prompts, retry logic, and search procedure) while the model weights are held fixed. The test-time training school uses hand-written RL pipelines to update the model's own weights on task feedback while the harness is held fixed. These two silos operate in isolation. We propose SIA, a self-improving loop in which a language-model agent (the Feedback-Agent) updates both the harness and the weights of a task-specific agent. We evaluate across three contrasting domains: Chinese legal charge classification, low-level GPU kernel optimisation, and single-cell RNA denoising. Combining both levers outperforms scaffold iteration alone on all three benchmarks. SIA-W+H achieves 25.1% over prior SOTA on LawBench, 12.4% faster GPU kernels than prior SOTA (1,017 vs 1,161 {\mu}s), and 20.4% over prior SOTA on denoising. Harness updates make the model agentic, shaping how it searches and acts, while weight updates build the domain intuition that no prompt or scaffold can instil.

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Evo-Bench: Can Language Models Improve Agent Harness?

cs.CL · 2026-08-10 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Evo-Bench selects tasks that respond to harness changes and shows frontier models can evolve executable agent harnesses with gains up to 16.6 points, though Office tasks remain difficult.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Evo-Bench: Can Language Models Improve Agent Harness? cs.CL · 2026-08-10 · conditional · none · ref 7 · internal anchor

    Evo-Bench selects tasks that respond to harness changes and shows frontier models can evolve executable agent harnesses with gains up to 16.6 points, though Office tasks remain difficult.