Pith. sign in

How much should you pay for restaking security?

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Restaking protocols have aggregated billions of dollars of security by utilizing token incentives and payments. A natural question to ask is: How much security do restaked services \emph{really} need to purchase? To answer this question, we expand a model of Durvasula and Roughgarden [DR24] that includes incentives and an expanded threat model consisting of strategic attackers and users. Our model shows that an adversary with a strictly submodular profit combined with strategic node operators who respond to incentives can avoid the large-scale cascading failures of~[DR24]. We utilize our model to construct an approximation algorithm for choosing token-based incentives that achieve a given security level against adversaries who are bounded in the number of services they can simultaneously attack. Our results suggest that incentivized restaking protocols can be secure with proper incentive management.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.GT 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

support 1

representative citing papers

Proof of Work With External Utilities

cs.GT · 2025-05-27 · conditional · novelty 6.0

In a Proof-of-Useful-Work model with quadratic costs and linear block rewards, the unique equilibrium has every miner participating, and miners profit most by concentrating their useful tasks into one block.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Proof of Work With External Utilities cs.GT · 2025-05-27 · conditional · none · ref 13 · internal anchor

    In a Proof-of-Useful-Work model with quadratic costs and linear block rewards, the unique equilibrium has every miner participating, and miners profit most by concentrating their useful tasks into one block.