The authors defend the topological gap protocol's false discovery rate estimate against two recent comments, adding robustness checks and disclosing a bias-range cropping bug in the published supplementary information.
The variations in experimental data parameters are explained [1], and TGP outcomes are not the consequence of measurement choices
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cond-mat.mes-hall 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Response to recent comments on Phys. Rev. B 107, 245423 (2023) and Subsection S4.3 of the Supp. Info. for Nature 638, 651-655 (2025)
The authors defend the topological gap protocol's false discovery rate estimate against two recent comments, adding robustness checks and disclosing a bias-range cropping bug in the published supplementary information.