Pith. sign in

Consistency of Honest Decision Trees and Random Forests

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

We study various types of consistency of honest decision trees and random forests in the regression setting. In contrast to related literature, our proofs are elementary and follow the classical arguments used for smoothing methods. Under mild regularity conditions on the regression function and data distribution, we establish weak and almost sure convergence of honest trees and honest forest averages to the true regression function, and moreover we obtain uniform convergence over compact covariate domains. The framework naturally accommodates ensemble variants based on subsampling and also a two-stage bootstrap sampling scheme. Our treatment synthesizes and simplifies existing analyses, in particular recovering several results as special cases. The elementary nature of the arguments clarifies the close relationship between data-adaptive partitioning and kernel-type methods, providing an accessible approach to understanding the asymptotic behavior of tree-based methods.

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Honesty in Causal Forests: When It Helps and When It Hurts cs.LG · 2025-06-16 · conditional · none · ref 2019 · internal anchor

    Honest estimation in causal forests can reduce CATE accuracy and require up to 27% more data, especially when effect heterogeneity is strong and detectable.