pith. sign in

hub

Semeval-2017 task 1: Semantic textual similarity-multilingual and cross-lingual focused evaluation

13 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

13 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) measures the meaning similarity of sentences. Applications include machine translation (MT), summarization, generation, question answering (QA), short answer grading, semantic search, dialog and conversational systems. The STS shared task is a venue for assessing the current state-of-the-art. The 2017 task focuses on multilingual and cross-lingual pairs with one sub-track exploring MT quality estimation (MTQE) data. The task obtained strong participation from 31 teams, with 17 participating in all language tracks. We summarize performance and review a selection of well performing methods. Analysis highlights common errors, providing insight into the limitations of existing models. To support ongoing work on semantic representations, the STS Benchmark is introduced as a new shared training and evaluation set carefully selected from the corpus of English STS shared task data (2012-2017).

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 1 other 1

citation-polarity summary

polarities

background 1 unclear 1

representative citing papers

Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks

cs.CL · 2019-08-27 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

Sentence-BERT adapts BERT with siamese and triplet networks to produce sentence embeddings for efficient cosine-similarity comparisons, cutting computation time from hours to seconds on similarity search while matching BERT accuracy.

DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attention

cs.CL · 2020-06-05 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

DeBERTa improves BERT-style models by separating content and relative position in attention and adding absolute positions to the decoder, yielding consistent gains on NLU and NLG tasks and the first single-model superhuman score on SuperGLUE.

LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning

cs.CL · 2025-02-05 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

LIMO achieves 63.3% on AIME24 and 95.6% on MATH500 via supervised fine-tuning on roughly 1% of the data used by prior models, supporting the claim that minimal strategic examples suffice when pre-training has already encoded domain knowledge.

Conjuring Semantic Similarity

cs.AI · 2024-10-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Semantic similarity between texts is measured by the Jeffreys divergence between the image distributions induced by conditioning a diffusion model on each text, computed via Monte-Carlo sampling of the reverse-time SDEs.

To Tune or Not To Tune? How About the Best of Both Worlds?

cs.CL · 2019-07-09 · unverdicted · novelty 3.0

A sequential fine-tuning strategy for pre-trained language models reports modest accuracy gains of 4.7%, 0.99%, and 0.72% on semantic similarity, sequence labeling, and text classification tasks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 13 of 13 citing papers.