Neither Bayesian nor frequentist fitting is uniformly better for epidemic forecasts; performance depends on phase and data, though the paper's own results undercut its phase-specific claims.
Bureau of Epidemiology and Center for Disease Control
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
q-bio.QM 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Comparative study of Bayesian and Frequentist methods for epidemic forecasting: Insights from simulated and historical data
Neither Bayesian nor frequentist fitting is uniformly better for epidemic forecasts; performance depends on phase and data, though the paper's own results undercut its phase-specific claims.