Pith. sign in

Investigating Labeler Bias in Face Annotation for Machine Learning

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

In a world increasingly reliant on artificial intelligence, it is more important than ever to consider the ethical implications of artificial intelligence on humanity. One key under-explored challenge is labeler bias, which can create inherently biased datasets for training and subsequently lead to inaccurate or unfair decisions in healthcare, employment, education, and law enforcement. Hence, we conducted a study to investigate and measure the existence of labeler bias using images of people from different ethnicities and sexes in a labeling task. Our results show that participants possess stereotypes that influence their decision-making process and that labeler demographics impact assigned labels. We also discuss how labeler bias influences datasets and, subsequently, the models trained on them. Overall, a high degree of transparency must be maintained throughout the entire artificial intelligence training process to identify and correct biases in the data as early as possible.

citation-role summary

other 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

other 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Stress-Testing ML Pipelines with Adversarial Data Corruption cs.LG · 2025-06-02 · conditional · none · ref 18 · internal anchor

    SAVAGE uses dependency graphs plus beam search and Bayesian optimization to find structured data corruptions that degrade ML pipelines far more than random or manual errors.