Pith. sign in

Order Matters: Investigate the Position Bias in Multi-constraint Instruction Following

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Real-world instructions with multiple constraints pose a significant challenge to existing large language models (LLMs). An observation is that the LLMs exhibit dramatic performance fluctuation when disturbing the order of the incorporated constraints. Yet, none of the existing works has systematically investigated this position bias problem in the field of multi-constraint instruction following. To bridge this gap, we design a probing task where we quantitatively measure the difficulty distribution of the constraints by a novel Difficulty Distribution Index (CDDI). Through the experimental results, we find that LLMs are more performant when presented with the constraints in a ``hard-to-easy'' order. This preference can be generalized to LLMs with different architecture or different sizes of parameters. Additionally, we conduct an explanation study, providing an intuitive insight into the correlation between the LLM's attention and constraint orders. Our code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/meowpass/PBIF.

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

How Many Instructions Can LLMs Follow at Once?

cs.AI · 2025-07-15 · conditional · novelty 6.0

IFScale measures instruction-following at densities from 10 to 500 constraints and finds that even top frontier models satisfy only about two-thirds of 500 simultaneous keyword instructions.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • How Many Instructions Can LLMs Follow at Once? cs.AI · 2025-07-15 · conditional · none · ref 32 · internal anchor

    IFScale measures instruction-following at densities from 10 to 500 constraints and finds that even top frontier models satisfy only about two-thirds of 500 simultaneous keyword instructions.