An empirical study showing that smaller monolingual language models are more vulnerable to adversarial attacks than larger multilingual models across 70 languages, though multilinguality alone does not guarantee security.
NLP Security and Ethics, in the Wild
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
As NLP models are used by a growing number of end-users, an area of increasing importance is NLP Security (NLPSec): assessing the vulnerability of models to malicious attacks and developing comprehensive countermeasures against them. While work at the intersection of NLP and cybersecurity has the potential to create safer NLP for all, accidental oversights can result in tangible harm (e.g., breaches of privacy or proliferation of malicious models). In this emerging field, however, the research ethics of NLP have not yet faced many of the long-standing conundrums pertinent to cybersecurity, until now. We thus examine contemporary works across NLPSec, and explore their engagement with cybersecurity's ethical norms. We identify trends across the literature, ultimately finding alarming gaps on topics like harm minimization and responsible disclosure. To alleviate these concerns, we provide concrete recommendations to help NLP researchers navigate this space more ethically, bridging the gap between traditional cybersecurity and NLP ethics, which we frame as ``white hat NLP''. The goal of this work is to help cultivate an intentional culture of ethical research for those working in NLP Security.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Beyond Weaponization: NLP Security for Medium and Lower-Resourced Languages in Their Own Right
An empirical study showing that smaller monolingual language models are more vulnerable to adversarial attacks than larger multilingual models across 70 languages, though multilinguality alone does not guarantee security.