Pith. sign in

Development and Clinical Evaluation of an AI Support Tool for Improving Telemedicine Photo Quality

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Telemedicine utilization was accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic, and skin conditions were a common use case. However, the quality of photographs sent by patients remains a major limitation. To address this issue, we developed TrueImage 2.0, an artificial intelligence (AI) model for assessing patient photo quality for telemedicine and providing real-time feedback to patients for photo quality improvement. TrueImage 2.0 was trained on 1700 telemedicine images annotated by clinicians for photo quality. On a retrospective dataset of 357 telemedicine images, TrueImage 2.0 effectively identified poor quality images (Receiver operator curve area under the curve (ROC-AUC) =0.78) and the reason for poor quality (Blurry ROC-AUC=0.84, Lighting issues ROC-AUC=0.70). The performance is consistent across age, gender, and skin tone. Next, we assessed whether patient-TrueImage 2.0 interaction led to an improvement in submitted photo quality through a prospective clinical pilot study with 98 patients. TrueImage 2.0 reduced the number of patients with a poor-quality image by 68.0%.

fields

eess.IV 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Enhanced Dermatology Image Quality Assessment via Cross-Domain Training

eess.IV · 2025-06-19 · conditional · novelty 4.0

Combining natural and dermatology image quality datasets to train a CNN improves dermatology image quality prediction compared with dermatology-only training, but the claimed 'optimal across domains' result is only partially supported.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Enhanced Dermatology Image Quality Assessment via Cross-Domain Training eess.IV · 2025-06-19 · conditional · none · ref 2022 · internal anchor

    Combining natural and dermatology image quality datasets to train a CNN improves dermatology image quality prediction compared with dermatology-only training, but the claimed 'optimal across domains' result is only partially supported.