AI peer reviewers show excessive agreement across papers and give higher scores after simple LLM-based stylistic rewriting, so general-purpose LLMs should not automate reviews without rigorous evaluation.
Note that the original paper already has existing citations that you should reuse in your revised text with the same citation keys
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluation
AI peer reviewers show excessive agreement across papers and give higher scores after simple LLM-based stylistic rewriting, so general-purpose LLMs should not automate reviews without rigorous evaluation.