Replacing standard self-attention with performer attention in the pooling layer of a language identification model improves average accuracy on VoxPopuli, FLEURS, and VoxLingua, while agent attention is comparable and theoretically cheaper.
On the use of Performer and Agent Attention for Spoken Language Identification
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
One of the methods for language Identification (LID) involves deriving speech representation from pre-trained models using self-supervised learning, followed by fine-tuning the model for the LID task. State-of-the-art approaches for LID use an attention-based statistical pooling layer to facilitate the aggregation of contextual information across time frames of the embedding vectors extracted from the pre-trained model. In this paper, we delve into exploring recently proposed attention mechanisms, namely performer and agent-attention, in conjunction with the statistical pooling layer. The LID experiments are performed on three datasets: VoxPopuli, FLEURS, and VoxLingua. We compare their performance against vanilla self-attention. Our findings suggest that performer-attention outperforms self-attention and agent-attention exhibits comparable or occasionally superior performance to self-attention, while also being computationally less expensive.
fields
eess.AS 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
On the use of Performer and Agent Attention for Spoken Language Identification
Replacing standard self-attention with performer attention in the pooling layer of a language identification model improves average accuracy on VoxPopuli, FLEURS, and VoxLingua, while agent attention is comparable and theoretically cheaper.