The authors define and demonstrate a 223-question evaluation method for eHMI proposals, tested on four existing designs plus a kinematic baseline, suggesting a hybrid kinematics-plus-text approach as potentially strongest while noting gaps in readability and learning speed.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.RO 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Defining an Evaluation Method for External Human-Machine Interfaces
The authors define and demonstrate a 223-question evaluation method for eHMI proposals, tested on four existing designs plus a kinematic baseline, suggesting a hybrid kinematics-plus-text approach as potentially strongest while noting gaps in readability and learning speed.