Non-diagnostic dialogue speech, after concatenation and demographic balancing, can perform nearly as well as diagnostic-task speech for Parkinson's disease classification, though validation leakage clouds the result.
Evaluating the Usefulness of Non-Diagnostic Speech Data for Developing Parkinson's Disease Classifiers
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Speech-based Parkinson's disease (PD) detection has gained attention for its automated, cost-effective, and non-intrusive nature. As research studies usually rely on data from diagnostic-oriented speech tasks, this work explores the feasibility of diagnosing PD on the basis of speech data not originally intended for diagnostic purposes, using the Turn-Taking (TT) dataset. Our findings indicate that TT can be as useful as diagnostic-oriented PD datasets like PC-GITA. We also investigate which specific dataset characteristics impact PD classification performance. The results show that concatenating audio recordings and balancing participants' gender and status distributions can be beneficial. Cross-dataset evaluation reveals that models trained on PC-GITA generalize poorly to TT, whereas models trained on TT perform better on PC-GITA. Furthermore, we provide insights into the high variability across folds, which is mainly due to large differences in individual speaker performance.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
eess.AS 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Evaluating the Usefulness of Non-Diagnostic Speech Data for Developing Parkinson's Disease Classifiers
Non-diagnostic dialogue speech, after concatenation and demographic balancing, can perform nearly as well as diagnostic-task speech for Parkinson's disease classification, though validation leakage clouds the result.