Pith. sign in

QCD Chemistry: Remarks on Diquarks

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

In connection with recent discoveries of heavy-quark containing exotic states publications discussing $Qq$ diquarks ($Q,q$ stand for a heavy and light quarks, respectively) proliferated in the literature. After a brief summary of the diquark concept I review various general reasons why the $Qq$ diquark (with sufficinetly heavy $Q$) does not exist. Then I argue (this is the focus of my talk) that the most direct way to confirm non-existence of the $Qq$ diquarks is the study of pre-asymptotic corrections in the inclusive decays of $Qqq$ baryons, e.g. $\Lambda_b$. Since the $c$ quarks are much lighter than $b$, namely, $m_b^2/m_c^2\sim 11$, traces of the $cq$ attraction in the color anti-triplet spin-0 state may or may not be present in the $cqq$ baryons.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

hep-ph 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.