Pith. sign in

Uncertainty estimation for classification and risk prediction on medical tabular data

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

In a data-scarce field such as healthcare, where models often deliver predictions on patients with rare conditions, the ability to measure the uncertainty of a model's prediction could potentially lead to improved effectiveness of decision support tools and increased user trust. This work advances the understanding of uncertainty estimation for classification and risk prediction on medical tabular data, in a two-fold way. First, we expand and refine the set of heuristics to select an uncertainty estimation technique, introducing tests for clinically-relevant scenarios such as generalization to uncommon pathologies, changes in clinical protocol and simulations of corrupted data. We furthermore differentiate these heuristics depending on the clinical use-case. Second, we observe that ensembles and related techniques perform poorly when it comes to detecting out-of-domain examples, a critical task which is carried out more successfully by auto-encoders. These remarks are enriched by considerations of the interplay of uncertainty estimation with class imbalance, post-modeling calibration and other modeling procedures. Our findings are supported by an array of experiments on toy and real-world data.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Realistic Evaluation of TabPFN v2 in Open Environments cs.LG · 2025-05-22 · conditional · none · ref 40 · internal anchor

    TabPFN v2 underperforms tree-based models on most open-environment tabular tasks and is only preferable on small, covariate-shifted, class-balanced data.