Pith. sign in

Title resolution pending

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

representative citing papers

How Reliable are LLMs for Reasoning on the Re-ranking task?

cs.CL · 2025-08-25 · reject · novelty 4.0

In a small Earth-science reranking dataset, DPO-trained LLMs rank best and SHAP attribution scores help a general LLM explain why items were selected, but the explanation claim rests on only two examples.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • How Reliable are LLMs for Reasoning on the Re-ranking task? cs.CL · 2025-08-25 · reject · none · ref 2

    In a small Earth-science reranking dataset, DPO-trained LLMs rank best and SHAP attribution scores help a general LLM explain why items were selected, but the explanation claim rests on only two examples.