Warned AI-assisted writers had their documents selected as human 54.13% of the time by judges versus 45.87% for unwarned writers, despite no measurable differences in text features.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Genre and model exert stronger influence on writing style than human/LLM source or decoding strategy in a broad comparison of lexicogrammatical features.
citing papers explorer
-
Can Humans Detect AI? Mining Textual Signals of AI-Assisted Writing Under Varying Scrutiny Conditions
Warned AI-assisted writers had their documents selected as human 54.13% of the time by judges versus 45.87% for unwarned writers, despite no measurable differences in text features.
-
Interpretable Stylistic Variation in Human and LLM Writing Across Genres, Models, and Decoding Strategies
Genre and model exert stronger influence on writing style than human/LLM source or decoding strategy in a broad comparison of lexicogrammatical features.