The (1-epsilon)-competition complexity of prophet secretary is Theta(ln(1/epsilon)) for single-threshold algorithms, Theta(ln(1/epsilon)/ln ln(1/epsilon)) for time-based and activation-based algorithms, and Theta(sqrt(ln(1/epsilon))) for fully adaptive algorithms.
New Prophet Inequalities via Poissonization and Sharding
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This work introduces \emph{sharding} and \emph{Poissonization} as a unified framework for analyzing prophet inequalities. Sharding involves splitting a random variable into several independent random variables, shards, that collectively mimic the original variable's behavior. We combine this with Poissonization, where these shards are modeled using a Poisson distribution. Despite the simplicity of our framework, we improve the competitive ratio analysis of a dozen well studied prophet inequalities in the literature, some of which have been studied for decades. This includes the \textsc{Top-$1$-of-$k$} prophet inequality, prophet secretary inequality, and semi-online prophet inequality, among others. This approach not only refines the constants but also offers a more intuitive and streamlined analysis for many prophet inequalities in the literature. Furthermore, it simplifies proofs of several known results and may be of independent interest for other variants of the prophet inequality, such as order-selection.
fields
cs.GT 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Competition Complexity of Prophet Secretary
The (1-epsilon)-competition complexity of prophet secretary is Theta(ln(1/epsilon)) for single-threshold algorithms, Theta(ln(1/epsilon)/ln ln(1/epsilon)) for time-based and activation-based algorithms, and Theta(sqrt(ln(1/epsilon))) for fully adaptive algorithms.