GPT-3.5 detects synthetic annotation errors in beat, chord, and key tasks above random chance, with accuracy partly influenced by musical concepts in the prompt.
Exploring GPT's Ability as a Judge in Music Understanding
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Recent progress in text-based Large Language Models (LLMs) and their extended ability to process multi-modal sensory data have led us to explore their applicability in addressing music information retrieval (MIR) challenges. In this paper, we use a systematic prompt engineering approach for LLMs to solve MIR problems. We convert the music data to symbolic inputs and evaluate LLMs' ability in detecting annotation errors in three key MIR tasks: beat tracking, chord extraction, and key estimation. A concept augmentation method is proposed to evaluate LLMs' music reasoning consistency with the provided music concepts in the prompts. Our experiments tested the MIR capabilities of Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT). Results show that GPT has an error detection accuracy of 65.20%, 64.80%, and 59.72% in beat tracking, chord extraction, and key estimation tasks, respectively, all exceeding the random baseline. Moreover, we observe a positive correlation between GPT's error finding accuracy and the amount of concept information provided. The current findings based on symbolic music input provide a solid ground for future LLM-based MIR research.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.IR 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Exploring GPT's Ability as a Judge in Music Understanding
GPT-3.5 detects synthetic annotation errors in beat, chord, and key tasks above random chance, with accuracy partly influenced by musical concepts in the prompt.