Under a new profile-separation condition, multinomial and biased-progressive NUTS mix in O~(1 + a*^2 kappa^2(1+gamma)^{4/3}) and O~(1 + a*^4 kappa^3(1+gamma)^2) transitions.
Windowed thinning and query complexity for the bouncy particle and Zigzag samplers
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Let $\mu(d x)\propto e^{-U(x)} d x$ on $\R^d$, where $U$ is $m$-strongly convex and $L$-smooth, and denote by $\kappa=L/m$ the condition number. We consider windowed thinning, an exact simulation method for the bouncy particle sampler and the coordinate Zigzag process. The method divides a trajectory into deterministic windows and uses a gradient evaluation at the beginning of each window to construct a tractable local envelope for the event rate. Combining this construction with quantitative mixing estimates and finite-time bounds on the expected numbers of bounces and flips yields query complexity guarantees from a Gaussian cold start. For total-variation error $\varepsilon$, the expected query counts are $O(\kappa^{1/2}d\,(d\log\kappa+\log\frac1\varepsilon))$ gradient queries for the bouncy particle sampler and $O(\kappa d^{1/4}(d\log\kappa+\log\frac1\varepsilon))$ full-gradient equivalents for Zigzag, where $d$ coordinate-partial queries count as one equivalent.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
math.ST 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A Profile-Separation Framework for Quantitative Convergence of No-U-Turn Samplers
Under a new profile-separation condition, multinomial and biased-progressive NUTS mix in O~(1 + a*^2 kappa^2(1+gamma)^{4/3}) and O~(1 + a*^4 kappa^3(1+gamma)^2) transitions.