Pith. sign in

The #DNN-Verification Problem: Counting Unsafe Inputs for Deep Neural Networks

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Deep Neural Networks are increasingly adopted in critical tasks that require a high level of safety, e.g., autonomous driving. While state-of-the-art verifiers can be employed to check whether a DNN is unsafe w.r.t. some given property (i.e., whether there is at least one unsafe input configuration), their yes/no output is not informative enough for other purposes, such as shielding, model selection, or training improvements. In this paper, we introduce the #DNN-Verification problem, which involves counting the number of input configurations of a DNN that result in a violation of a particular safety property. We analyze the complexity of this problem and propose a novel approach that returns the exact count of violations. Due to the #P-completeness of the problem, we also propose a randomized, approximate method that provides a provable probabilistic bound of the correct count while significantly reducing computational requirements. We present experimental results on a set of safety-critical benchmarks that demonstrate the effectiveness of our approximate method and evaluate the tightness of the bound.

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Statistical Runtime Verification for LLMs via Robustness Estimation cs.LG · 2025-04-24 · conditional · none · ref 32 · internal anchor

    RoMA, a statistical robustness estimator, is adapted to black-box language models and is shown to approximate exact verification within 1% on small networks while scaling to BERT sentiment analysis.