GAI tools' content moderation policies are comprehensive in scope but thin on user reporting and appeals, and Reddit users report frequent frustration with opaque moderation decisions.
A Pathway Towards Responsible AI Generated Content
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
abstract
AI Generated Content (AIGC) has received tremendous attention within the past few years, with content generated in the format of image, text, audio, video, etc. Meanwhile, AIGC has become a double-edged sword and recently received much criticism regarding its responsible usage. In this article, we focus on 8 main concerns that may hinder the healthy development and deployment of AIGC in practice, including risks from (1) privacy; (2) bias, toxicity, misinformation; (3) intellectual property (IP); (4) robustness; (5) open source and explanation; (6) technology abuse; (7) consent, credit, and compensation; (8) environment. Additionally, we provide insights into the promising directions for tackling these risks while constructing generative models, enabling AIGC to be used more responsibly to truly benefit society.
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
"I Cannot Write This Because It Violates Our Content Policy": Understanding Content Moderation Policies and User Experiences in Generative AI Products
GAI tools' content moderation policies are comprehensive in scope but thin on user reporting and appeals, and Reddit users report frequent frustration with opaque moderation decisions.