LLMs show an echo chamber bias in evaluating classical Chinese poetry, systematically favoring machine-generated outputs that violate strict form rules over human expert assessments.
prosodic_adherence
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Capabilities and Evaluation Biases of Large Language Models in Classical Chinese Poetry Generation: A Case Study on Tang Poetry
LLMs show an echo chamber bias in evaluating classical Chinese poetry, systematically favoring machine-generated outputs that violate strict form rules over human expert assessments.