The paper introduces an atomic learning objective system and shows LLMs can label physics questions with moderate agreement against a single expert's ground truth.
CLASS: A Design Framework for building Intelligent Tutoring Systems based on Learning Science principles
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We present a design framework called Conversational Learning with Analytical Step-by-Step Strategies (CLASS) for building advanced Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) powered by high-performance Large Language Models (LLMs). The CLASS framework empowers ITS with two key capabilities. First, through a carefully curated scaffolding dataset, CLASS equips ITS with essential problem-solving strategies, enabling it to provide tutor-like, step-by-step guidance to students. Second, by using a dynamic conversational dataset, CLASS assists ITS in facilitating natural language interactions, fostering engaging student-tutor conversations. The CLASS framework also provides valuable insights into ITS' internal decision-making process which allows seamless integration of user feedback, thus enabling continuous refinement and improvement. We also present a proof-of-concept ITS, referred to as SPOCK, which is trained using the CLASS framework with a focus on introductory college-level biology content. A carefully constructed protocol was developed for SPOCK's preliminary evaluation, examining aspects such as the factual accuracy and relevance of its responses. Experts in the field of biology offered favorable remarks, particularly highlighting SPOCK's capability to break down questions into manageable subproblems and provide encouraging responses to students. Code and models are available at https://github.com/luffycodes/Tutorbot-Spock.
fields
cs.CY 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Atomic Learning Objectives Labeling: A High-Resolution Approach for Physics Education
The paper introduces an atomic learning objective system and shows LLMs can label physics questions with moderate agreement against a single expert's ground truth.