AgentSLABench adds resource budgets and cost/latency/memory profiles to AI agent evaluation, but its headline results rest on tiny samples and an internal inconsistency.
A Survey on Data Selection for LLM Instruction Tuning
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Instruction tuning is a vital step of training large language models (LLMs), so how to enhance the effect of instruction tuning has received increased attention. Existing works indicate that the quality of the dataset is more crucial than the quantity during instruction tuning of LLMs. Therefore, recently a lot of studies focus on exploring the methods of selecting high-quality subset from instruction datasets, aiming to reduce training costs and enhance the instruction-following capabilities of LLMs. This paper presents a comprehensive survey on data selection for LLM instruction tuning. Firstly, we introduce the wildly used instruction datasets. Then, we propose a new taxonomy of the data selection methods and provide a detailed introduction of recent advances, and the evaluation strategies and results of data selection methods are also elaborated in detail. Finally, we emphasize the open challenges and present new frontiers of this task.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
AgentSLABench: Evaluating and Benchmarking Agentic Systems Under Resource Constraints
AgentSLABench adds resource budgets and cost/latency/memory profiles to AI agent evaluation, but its headline results rest on tiny samples and an internal inconsistency.