Pith. sign in

This Prompt is Measuring <MASK>: Evaluating Bias Evaluation in Language Models

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Bias research in NLP seeks to analyse models for social biases, thus helping NLP practitioners uncover, measure, and mitigate social harms. We analyse the body of work that uses prompts and templates to assess bias in language models. We draw on a measurement modelling framework to create a taxonomy of attributes that capture what a bias test aims to measure and how that measurement is carried out. By applying this taxonomy to 90 bias tests, we illustrate qualitatively and quantitatively that core aspects of bias test conceptualisations and operationalisations are frequently unstated or ambiguous, carry implicit assumptions, or be mismatched. Our analysis illuminates the scope of possible bias types the field is able to measure, and reveals types that are as yet under-researched. We offer guidance to enable the community to explore a wider section of the possible bias space, and to better close the gap between desired outcomes and experimental design, both for bias and for evaluating language models more broadly.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CY 1

years

2024 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

The Generative AI Ethics Playbook

cs.CY · 2024-12-17 · conditional · novelty 4.0

A structured playbook that collects existing guidance, checklists, and case studies to help generative AI practitioners identify and mitigate ethical harms across six lifecycle stages.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • The Generative AI Ethics Playbook cs.CY · 2024-12-17 · conditional · none · ref 55 · internal anchor

    A structured playbook that collects existing guidance, checklists, and case studies to help generative AI practitioners identify and mitigate ethical harms across six lifecycle stages.