Pith. sign in

LongMedBench: Benchmarking Medical Agents for Long-Horizon Clinical Decision-Making

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

In this work, we introduce LongMedBench, a real-world EHR-based benchmark for long-horizon clinical decision-making. Prior evaluations of LLM-based medical agents have largely emphasized short-context knowledge QA and tool use. However, real-world medical care is inherently longitudinal, and clinicians must aggregate evidence across repeated visits, tests, and evolving treatments. Therefore, long-horizon interaction is essential for realistic assessment. LongMedBench is constructed via a reproducible pipeline that integrates MIMIC-IV admission records and clinical notes into time-series event streams and long-context memory datasets, enabling long-horizon, multi-session interactions between agents and a clinical environment. It comprises 335 patients, with 19.72 inpatient visits per patient on average and 44.91 medical events per visit. Guided by the long-horizon decision process, we propose an evaluation taxonomy with three suites: fact-based QA, temporal reasoning, and long-horizon decision-making. This taxonomy measures how agents understand and leverage historical patient information over extended horizons. Our experiments show that while recent LLMs can make good use of explicit timestamps, they have challenges in implicit time inference; The RAG and agent memory system can improve the performance of information retrieval tasks, but the performance of decision-making tasks is highly dependent on the model's immediate context.

citation-role summary

dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

dataset 1

polarities

use dataset 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • CliniCARE-Bench: Clinical Calibrated Audit of Medical Reasoning in EHR cs.AI · 2026-08-07 · conditional · none · ref 32 · internal anchor

    A new 750-case EHR benchmark that jointly scores verdicts, evidence grounding, policy use, process adherence, and abstention finds that all 16 tested agents under-abstain and that defect-free accuracy reorders the leaderboard.