Lasso is convex and fast but biased; SCAD and MCP reduce bias but are non-convex and slower, so method choice depends on context.
Double-Estimation-Friendly Inference for High-Dimensional Measurement Error Models with Non-Sparse Adaptability
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In this paper, we introduce an innovative testing procedure for assessing individual hypotheses in high-dimensional linear regression models with measurement errors. This method remains robust even when either the X-model or Y-model is misspecified. We develop a double robust score function that maintains a zero expectation if one of the models is incorrect, and we construct a corresponding score test. We first show the asymptotic normality of our approach in a low-dimensional setting, and then extend it to the high-dimensional models. Our analysis of high-dimensional settings explores scenarios both with and without the sparsity condition, establishing asymptotic normality and non-trivial power performance under local alternatives. Simulation studies and real data analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
fields
stat.ME 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A Short Note of Comparison between Convex and Non-convex Penalized Likelihood
Lasso is convex and fast but biased; SCAD and MCP reduce bias but are non-convex and slower, so method choice depends on context.